Who Registers A Non-profit Domain Name
The battle over the future of .org domain names is over. For now.
An organization chosen Icann, short for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, handles the internet's address volume. It's responsible for making sure you reach our website when you blazon wired.com into your browser. Simply Icann outsources the details to other companies and organizations. Ane of those is Public Interest Registry, which handles .org domain proper name registrations, along with .ngo and .ong domains.
PIR in turn is owned by the Net Lodge, a nonprofit system founded in 1992 to promote the advancement of the cyberspace. Last Nov, the Internet Guild appear that it would sell PIR to a newly formed for-profit private disinterestedness firm called Ethos Capital letter for $1.one billion. But the sale required approving by Icann. Thursday evening Icann said it rejected the proposed auction.
The proposal was contentious, to say the least. Countless nonprofits apply .org domain names for their websites. Terminal June, Icann removed a cap on how rapidly PIR could increase rates for registering .org domain names; the limit had been 10 per centum per year. Many feared that Ethos Upper-case letter would toll-gouge nonprofits, activists, and others using .org domain names. There was also a general sense that the registry serving so many nonprofits should itself be a mission-driven, not profit-motivated, organization.
Others raised concerns well-nigh the nature of the deal itself. In Nov, The Register reported that Ethos Uppercase'due south domain proper name, ethoscapital.com, was registered by former Icann CEO Fadi Chehade in May 2019, when it appeared likely that Icann would elevator the price cap on .org registrations. Chehade had left Icann in 2016. Nora Abusitta-Ouri, who also left Icann in 2016 according to her profile on Ethos Capital letter'due south website, is listed as the company'southward "primary purpose officer." The names of three Ethos directors were redacted in documents released by Icann, raising additional questions about the buying and transparency of the company.
The Icann lath reviewed hundreds of pages of documentation and responses from PIR, the Internet Society, and Ethos Capital letter before rejecting the proposal, according to the arrangement'south announcement. It listed several reasons information technology blocked the bargain, including that the bargain would consequence in "modify from the fundamental public interest nature of PIR to an entity that is leap to serve the interests of its corporate stakeholders, and which has no meaningful plan to protect or serve the .org community."
ISPs shouldn't exist able to block some sorts of data and prioritize others—here'southward what to know about the struggle to care for data on the internet the same.
In statements on the Ethos Capital website keypointsabout.org, both the Internet Club and Ethos Uppercase said Icann had overstepped its role. "Although the Internet Club respects Icann'south role in supporting the internet'southward technical coordination functions, we are disappointed that Icann has acted as a regulatory body it was never meant to exist," the Cyberspace Society's statement says. "Even so, nosotros respect the review procedure that Icann undertook."
The Internet Society said it would not effort again to sell PIR. "Now that nosotros know that Icann believes its remit to exist much larger than we believe it is, we tin country this clearly: neither PIR nor any of its operations are for sale now, and the Net Society will resist vigorously whatsoever suggestion that they ought to be," Internet Club president and CEO Andrew Sullivan wrote in a blog mail service Fri.
Among those who questioned the deal was California chaser general Xavier Becerra, who in January sent a letter to Icann seeking more than data. Icann is based in California. Becerra's request, which Icann interpreted every bit the equivalent of a subpoena, led Icann to delay its decision from February until this week. "Icann's decision restores some conviction that the nonprofit community may go on to be driven by a want to serve the public, not to make a quick buck at charitable donors' and taxpayers' expense," Becerra said in a statement.
Activists celebrated the decision. "Nosotros commend Icann on hearing the concerns of about a g organizations and over 50,000 people who demanded information technology reject the sale," the Electronic Frontier Foundation tweeted Th night. "Your voices protected every .org website, and everyone who depends on them."
Updated, 5/one/2020, six:10pm: This story has been updated with details of a weblog post past the Internet Social club.
More than Great WIRED Stories
- To run my best marathon at age 44, I had to outrun my past
- Amazon workers describe daily risks in a pandemic
- Stephen Wolfram invites you to solve physics
- Clever cryptography could protect privacy in contact-tracing apps
- Everything you need to work from home like a pro
- 👁 AI uncovers a potential Covid-nineteen handling. Plus: Become the latest AI news
- 🏃🏽♀️ Want the best tools to get salubrious? Bank check out our Gear squad's picks for the best fitness trackers, running gear (including shoes and socks), and all-time headphones
Who Registers A Non-profit Domain Name,
Source: https://www.wired.com/story/webs-org-domain-run-nonprofit/
Posted by: durhamsuffigh.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Who Registers A Non-profit Domain Name"
Post a Comment